shahbaz_nadeem
IND vs ENG | Fit-again Axar Patel added to Indian squad; Nadeem and Rahul Chahar withdrawn
By admin | | 0 Comments |


All-rounder Axar Patel, on Thursday, edged closer to making his Test debut for India as the selectors added the left-armer to the squad after he successfully passed a fitness test. With the addition of Axar to the main squad, the duo of Rahul Chahar and Shahbaz Nadeem have been withdrawn. Axar Patel is all set to make his Test debut in the second Test versus England, starting Saturday, as the BCCI confirmed the addition of the 27-year-old to the main squad after he passed a fitness test. Patel, who was picked in the squad for the first two Tests to cover up for Jadeja, picked up an injury on the morning of the first Test, due to which he was subsequently replaced in the squad by the duo of Rahul Chahar and Shahbaz Nadeem. However, with him now having recovered, both Chahar and Nadeem have been relegated to the ‘standbys’. “Axar Patel has recovered completely and is now available for selection for the 2nd Paytm Test in Chennai against England to be played from Saturday, 13th February. The all-rounder had complained of pain in his left knee and was ruled out of the first Test,” read a BCCI release on Thursday. “The All-India Senior Selection Committee have now withdrawn Shahbaz Nadeem and Rahul Chahar from the main squad and added the duo back to the group of standby players.”The addition of Axar, coupled with the removal of both Chahar and Nadeem, almost makes it certain that the 27-year-old all-rounder will make his debut tomorrow. Who India will pick as the third spinner in the XI, however, remains to be seen. Follow us on Facebook hereStay connected with us on Twitter hereLike and share our Instagram page here .
คาสิโน99 88 คาสิโน 88คาสิโน สมัครเอเย่น คาสิโน คาสิโน โบนัส 100
Reports | Ravindra Jadeja ruled out of England Test series; not to join Indian team in Ahmedabad
By admin | | 0 Comments |


Ravindra Jadeja, who suffered a finger injury during the third Test against Australia in Sydney, has been reportedly ruled out of the remainder of the Test series and will not join the Ahmedabad bubble as originally planned. He was sent to the NCA in Bengaluru for 'further management of his injury'.Over the last few years, Ravindra Jadeja has grown in stature to become one of the most important members of the Indian Test side, especially in home conditions. However, he was ruled out of the first two Tests in Chennai after dislocating his thumb during the Sydney Test against Australia. He was subsequently ruled out of the Brisbane Test was sent to the National Cricket Academy (NCA) in Bengaluru for 'further management of his injury'.However, Cricbuzz now reported that his injury hasn't recovered enough for him to take any part in the third and fourth Test and he is all set to set out for those two games as well. Jadeja was supposed to reach Ahmedabad early for the mandatory quarantine to be ready to join the full squad but now, in all probability, that is shelved. An official confirmation is awaited.In Jadeja's absence, India decided to go with Washington Sundar as the batting all-rounder as Axar Patel suffered a knee injury in the last moment. With Ashwin and Shahbaz Nadeem bowling in tandem with Sundar, the side had not a lot to offer in terms of variations. Kohli conceded that India will think of the combinations ahead for the second Test."There are no regrets whatsoever on that decision. Moving forward, we will think of the combinations which bring us variety as a bowling attack, and not one dimensional, turning away from the bat." the India captain said in reply to a query on Kuldeep.Interestingly, there are reports that Axar Patel has been recovered fully and joined the nets. He is one of the players, who could get the nod ahead to make his Test debut in Chennai.Follow us on Facebook hereStay connected with us on Twitter hereLike and share our Instagram page here .
คาสิโน99 88 คาสิโน 88คาสิโน สมัครเอเย่น คาสิโน คาสิโน โบนัส 100
IND vs ENG | If India lose second Test, Virat Kohli should give up captaincy, feels Monty Panesar
By admin | | 0 Comments |


Former English spinner Monty Panesar feels that Virat Kohli will be under pressure for his leadership while saying that if India lose the second Test, then the skipper should think of relinquishing the captaincy. Panesar further stated that India were really defensive in the first Test.India lost four games on a trot when Virat Kohli led the side, which brought the debate squarely on him. Given the way the Indian team performed in the first Test in Chennai, questions were asked if Kohli would be better placed playing purely as a batsman where he has a lot to offer to the Indian team. With Ajinkya Rahane just being off a brilliant series as captain, following a three-game unbeaten run with a depleted side, he has become a favourite among many fans and experts. Monty Panesar, who first came face to face with Kohli during the 2012 series that India went on to lose subsequently, feels that Kohli should leave the captaincy duties if India lose the second Test."Virat will be under pressure. This is an important series for him. If he loses the second Test, I think he should give up his captaincy. Because India will be down 2-0 in the series, and they should change the captain. Virat desperately needs a win or a draw. If he doesn't, it could be his last match as captain," Panesar told TimesofIndia.com.India picked Shahbaz Nadeem over Kuldeep Yadav despite the presence of a flatter bowler like Washington Sundar in the opening Test and even though the Jharkhand spinner picked up four wickets across two innings, he was conceding a lot of runs and bowled a nine-ball over due to his excessive overstepping. Panesar stated that India should've picked Kuldeep Yadav ahead of Nadeem in order to provide the bowling unit a more attacking edge."I think India went defensive in their selection policy. They should have picked Kuldeep Yadav in the first Test. He should have been included as a second spinner in place of Shahbaz Nadeem on that track. It was really surprising to see Virat not go for Kuldeep," Panesar said."That was not a good call. I think Kuldeep should have been an automatic selection. England haven't really practiced against a Chinaman bowler. So, Kuldeep would have done wonders for India. Nadeem wasn't sharp and probably was the weakest link in the team. There was no need to play Nadeem. And third and final point is India badly missed and struggled without Ravindra Jadeja. India were defensive in their approach," Panesar further added.Follow us on Facebook hereStay connected with us on Twitter hereLike and share our Instagram page here .
คาสิโน99 88 คาสิโน 88คาสิโน สมัครเอเย่น คาสิโน คาสิโน โบนัส 100
IND vs ENG | We didn’t put much application as a batting unit; focus is always on long partnerships, states Virat Kohli
By admin | | 0 Comments |


After another loss in the first match of a Test series, Virat Kohli has stated that India didn’t put much application as a batting unit in the first innings. He also raised the question about the state of the SG ball while adding that there was no real debate over the management not picking Kuldeep.On the back of a stressful series against Australia, where they won 2-1, India were put under the pressure on day one, in unfavourable conditions for bowlers. Right from the very first over of the day, the Indian team were put under the pump by the visitors, aided by Joe Root’s double century, which blew them apart. While India were expected to put a similar show with the bat in their first innings, they conceded a huge 241-run lead. Indian skipper Virat Kohli showed his displeasure over the application shown by the batting unit in the first innings. He added that the plan was to bat long in the first innings, chasing England’s total. However, at the same time, he reinstated milestones is something that they don’t really think about but instead focused on building long partnerships. “I think the Test probably shifted in their (England)’s favour when we batted in the first innings because we were looking to bat long and we couldn’t do that. There wasn’t much application shown by us as a batting unit, something that we take a lot of pride in. Look these milestones (100s) and all we don’t think about too much. We just look at building partnerships and put the team in good positions,” Kohli told pressers in the post-match press conference. “Someone has scored a century in the last five matches doesn’t matter to us but if people do put partnerships that help us win, that’s what matters. For us, it about trying to win a game of cricket and if we need to do play solid cricket, we should be able to do it. There’s no one way about it. As a batting unit, our focus would be on long partnerships.” he added.Kohli also reinstated that the state of the pitch didn’t help India on the first two days, with the deck being flat and slow. However, he stated that England’s first innings was the major differentiator between the two teams. “Look at the reality was that pitch was flat and slow. I’m not telling it as an excuse but that was the reality on the first two days of the game. It was only after third day when the pitch started to change. Before that, it was a very flat and slow pitch. Look, they got big runs on board in the first innings. We have to understand that’s the dynamics of the sport.”While Ashwin earlier raised complains over the quality of the SG ball, Kohli also expressed his surprise over the destruction of the ball completely on the first day of the five-day encounter. “The quality of the ball (SG) as well wasn’t something that we were pleased to see, that has been an issue in the past as well. The ball was destroyed in 60 overs, it’s not something that you are ready to experience as a Test side. England played better cricket than us.”The 32-year-old also stressed that the choice of picking Shahbaz Nadeem over Kuldeep Yadav is for variety, something that he revealed that they would lack in Kuldeep’s inclusion. “Not really (Kuldeep for Shahbaz) when we are playing two off-spinners, we needed variety, hence the decision to pick Shahbaz Nadeem. There was never a second doubt on the decision to pick Nadeem over Kuldeep. Going forward, we will think about what best we can do and then work on the team combination,” he concluded.Follow us on Facebook hereStay connected with us on Twitter hereLike and share our Instagram page here .
คาสิโน99 88 คาสิโน 88คาสิโน สมัครเอเย่น คาสิโน คาสิโน โบนัส 100
IND และ ENG | นักขว้างลูกที่สี่และห้าของเราไม่ถึงระดับนี้ – วิรัชโคลินียอมรับ
By admin | | 0 Comments |


Virat Kohli นักกระโดดร่มชาวอินเดียยอมรับว่า Shahbaz Nadim และ Washington Sundar นักกระโดดร่มคนที่สี่และห้าของอินเดียไม่ได้ออกแรงกดดันมากพอและปลดปล่อยอังกฤษจากห่วงในขั้นตอนสำคัญ โคห์ลีกล่าวต่อไปว่า "ไม่มีข้อแก้ตัว" ในอินเดีย แต่รับรองว่าฝ่ายนั้นจะไม่พอใจอย่างมาก ในระหว่างการทดสอบครั้งแรกประเด็นที่ใหญ่ที่สุดของการสนทนาก่อนบอลคือการละเว้นของกุลดิปยาดาฟและในท้ายที่สุดแกนของอินเดียกลายเป็นเพียงหยิบมือเดียว ในการรับบทเป็นนักขว้างลูกที่สี่และห้าทีมงานได้เลือกนักปั่นมือซ้ายของวอชิงตันซันดาร์และชาห์บาซนาดิม แต่อังกฤษนำทั้งคู่ไปทำความสะอาดซึ่งทำคะแนนได้มากกว่า 3.50 จากสองนัด สปินเนอร์ที่ไม่มีประสบการณ์ การแสดงเข้าจังหวะของ Nadim และ Sun ปลดปล่อยความกดดันของทั้งสามคนของ Bumra, Ishant และ Ashwin ซึ่งทุกคนมีทัวร์พิเศษ เมื่อพูดถึงเบื้องหลังการโจมตีครั้งที่ 227 คอลลียอมรับว่าอินเดียเฉย ในความคิดของเขานักขว้างลูกที่สี่และห้าไม่ได้กดดันมากพอ "เป็นราคาที่ยุติธรรม (ชามที่สี่และห้าไม่เพียงพอ) คุณต้องเล่นโบว์ลิ่งเพื่อกดดันและเสริมความแข็งแกร่งให้คู่ต่อสู้ เราไม่เก่งในเกมนี้มันดีที่ไม่ต้องแสดง แต่มันสำคัญมากที่เราจะต้องเข้าใจความคิดของเรา ฉันคิดว่าเราทำงานได้ดีกับลูกบอลในรอบที่สองและกดดันพวกเขา” คอลลี่กล่าวในการนำเสนอโดยสังเกตว่านักขว้างที่มีประสบการณ์เหล่านี้ไม่เพียง แต่อนุญาตให้นักขว้างลูกที่ไม่มีประสบการณ์เท่านั้น แต่ยังรวมถึงค้างคาวที่มีประสบการณ์ในการลดสมาธิด้วย โอกาสแรกช่วยให้คุณลดลงเหลือ 73/4 โดยยังคงเงื่อนไขที่ดีสำหรับการโจมตีด้านข้าง โคห์ลีกล่าวว่าค้างคาวยังต้องการการวิเคราะห์และแก้ไขอีกมาก:“ เมื่อร่วมกับค้างคาวเราได้ทำการตัดสินใจหลายอย่างโดยทิ้งสิ่งที่ต้องการและวิเคราะห์ในฐานะคนตีลูก เราเรียนรู้ที่จะอยู่เคียงข้างเสมอและเรากำลังพัฒนาอยู่ด้านข้างและการทดสอบคริกเก็ตเป็นเรื่องยาก " โจรู ธ ชนะการโยนและการพลิกเหรียญมีความสำคัญมากเมื่ออังกฤษชนะ 190 ครั้งซ้อนเพื่อนำความทุกข์ยากมาสู่เจ้าภาพ โอกาสที่ยาวนานของอังกฤษทำให้ชีวิตยากลำบากสำหรับชาวตะวันตกของอินเดียโดยกล่าวว่าการเล่นโบว์ลิ่งของพวกเขาจะเริ่มเล่นโบว์ลิ่งก็ต่อเมื่อโบว์ลิ่งเริ่มเสื่อมลง แต่ถึงแม้จะมีความเด็ดขาด Collie ก็บอกว่า "ไม่มีข้อแก้ตัว" ในด้านนี้และยอมรับว่าพวกเขาถูกผลักดันจากฝ่ายอังกฤษที่ขยายตัวออกไปทุกด้าน: "อังกฤษพร้อมสำหรับการสู้รบครั้งนี้ (ขว้างปา) ฉันคิดว่ามันเด็ดขาด เราไม่ต้องการได้อะไรจากอังกฤษกับเกมของพวกเขา ไม่ขอโทษ. เราเป็นคนที่ยอมรับและเรียนรู้จากความล้มเหลวและความผิดพลาดของเรา »การทดสอบครั้งที่สองจะจัดขึ้นที่เจนไน แต่ไม่มีรอบเวลาผู้เล่นจะกลับมาที่สนามในสี่วัน เวลา. โคลีมั่นใจว่าอินเดียจะเพิ่มความร้อนแรงและเข้มข้นสำหรับช่วงที่เหลือของซีรีส์และกล่าวว่า "คริกเก็ตที่น่าสนใจ" รอแฟน ๆ "สิ่งหนึ่งที่แน่นอนคือในอีกสามนัดข้างหน้าเราจะต้องต่อสู้อย่างหนักหน่วงและไม่ปล่อยให้สิ่งต่างๆหลุดลอยไปเหมือนในการทดสอบนี้ เราต้องเริ่มต้นด้วยการพูดที่ดีและกดดันฝ่ายค้าน ทำความเข้าใจเกี่ยวกับสนามการก้าวของสนามและสิ่งที่นักแข่งกำลังทำอยู่ ท้ายที่สุดนี่คือความคิดเห็นของเราและเรากำลังผูกมันกลับ เรารู้วิธีที่จะกระโดดและเราจะทำให้ดีที่สุดในเกมถัดไป “ ติดตามเราบน Facebook ชอบเราที่นี่บน Twitter กดไลค์เราและแชร์หน้า Instagram ของเรา
คาสิโน99 88 คาสิโน 88คาสิโน สมัครเอเย่น คาสิโน คาสิโน โบนัส 100
Why the Chennai Test has shown that India’s ‘Jaddu-obsession’ is unhealthy
By admin | | 0 Comments |


England won the toss in the first Test of a tour they were expected to lose 4-0 and batted and batted and batted - for 190 overs. And scored 578. Understandably, the Chepauk curator has received plenty of flack, but we look at why the first innings exposed a bigger issue at hand for the hosts.What’s the issue?India’s obsession to field a Ravindra Jadeja clone. Ever since India realized that Ravindra Jadeja’s batting was reliable enough for him to warrant a spot in the Top 7, they’ve deployed a five-bowler strategy. The wicket-keeper, Jadeja and Ashwin - in no particular order - slot in at 6, 7 and 8 respectively, giving the side the flexibility to play three more specialist bowlers pertinent to the conditions. In the absence of Jadeja in the first Test in Chennai, the management looked to replicate the same tactic by installing a Jadeja prototype but, erm, let’s say it did not go down too well. The bowling, ultimately, lacked bite and the hosts ended up conceding 578, with the fourth and the fifth bowlers - Sundar and Nadeem - returning combined figures of 2/265 off 70 overs. The wicket, indisputably, was flat, but the 190 overs demands introspection over India’s tactic. How is the Jaddu-obsession detrimental to the team?Logically, one would think playing five bowlers in comparison to four is bound to yield the side better results with the ball, but that is a bland assumption devoid of key intangibles. What ultimately matters is if the bowlers picked possess the quality to derail the opposition. In the absence of Jadeja, India were keen to blood-in a like-for-like replacement, hence the eagerness to field one of Washington Sundar or Axar Patel. Both Sundar and Axar are finger-spinners capable of batting at #7, and both offer the three-dimensionality that Jadeja brings to the table. But while it is true that they bring the same package as Jadeja, there is daylight in the quality of the primary skill (bowling, in this case) between Sundar/Axar and Jadeja. The Saurashtra all-rounder is often celebrated for his three-dimensionality, but people tend to conveniently forget that he is, behind Ashwin, the second-best spinner across the past decade. Completely keeping his batting aside, Jadeja averages 24.32 with the ball, and this number comes down to a ridiculous 21.06 in 33 Test matches at home. Just to put into perspective how good these numbers are, Ashwin, the greatest off-spinner since Muralitharan, averages two more (23.14) at home. By selecting a ‘Jadeja prototype’ India are fitting someone in the side who does the same things, albeit much worse, but are simply not doing what they should be doing: picking a spinner who offers the same threat with the ball. Sundar’s outing in the first innings is a classic case in point - he filled the Jadeja-shaped void in the side in terms of the package, yet ultimately failed at his primary job, which is to threaten with the ball. He is by no means to blame for it, for he’s far away from being a Test-level spinner, but him being picked to serve as a third spinner means that he needs to provide a cutting edge with the ball; and not just serve ‘handy’ owing to his package. This would also have held true to Axar had he been picked. Axar, too, is light-years away from being amongst the Top 5 spinners in the country and was, as revealed by Kohli himself, only considered because of India’s Jaddu obsession. This is not to deviate from the fact that India ultimately found themselves in the position they did because of the lacklustre display of the designated second spinner, Shahbaz Nadeem. Yet these kinds of situations are precisely why you pick a fifth bowler (in this case, a third spinner) - to make up even if one of the premier bowlers have an off-game. Nadeem had a performance to forget, yes, but it was exacerbated by the fact that Sundar was incapable of filling-in and masking it, ultimately defeating the purpose of having a fifth bowler. “This is just the three-spinners scenario; a Jadeja-prototype can still play if India field three pacers.”Unless the team plays in a SENA-like wicket which is a paradise for pacers, this statement won’t hold true. India, particularly of late, have been drifting towards accommodating three seamers at home but this does not change the fact that the key to success lies in the hands of the spinners. From January 1, 2015 to up until the start of the ongoing Test, Indian spinners had taken almost twice as many wickets (330) as the pacers (166) in home games. This emphasizes the importance of the role the second spinner has to play, even in a three-man pace attack.  A Jadeja-prototype might be a flexible option but that player will not be of great use to the side unless he is as good as Jadeja himself with the ball. Does it mean India should just pick their five best bowlers? This can, of course, always be experimented with, but it will leave the side with a worryingly long tail. For instance, as soon as Axar injured himself, India could have gone ahead with Kuldeep, Nadeem and Ashwin as their three spinners but that would have left them with no half-decent batsman after Pant. Ashwin had a wild day out in Sydney but in his last 17 Tests at home, he averages 11.93 with the bat with no fifty-plus scores. Hence they had to make a compromise, and it came in the form of them leaving out Kuldeep (you could argue the Nadeem selection also had some Jaddu-obsession attached to it, for he is also a left-armer). So, what is the solution?Simple: in the absence of Jadeja, India either need to revert back to a four-bowler + 1 batting all-rounder strategy or ensure that, barring Ashwin, the second spinner they pick is the best spinner at their disposal, treating the No.7 slot as an all-rounder. In Chennai, Kuldeep, despite being a bigger threat than Nadeem, was overlooked because he turned the ball the same way as both Ashwin and the Jaddu prototype Sundar; as it turned out, Sundar and Nadeem’s lack of dexterity made the decision look ridiculous. Cracks can be papered over on turning tracks but, as was the case in the first two days of Chennai, on flat wickets it will be skill - and not the package - which will help punch holes in the heart of the opposition. Particularly with India completely reverting to preparing ‘we-will-outbat-you’ kind of flat wickets, it would become increasingly difficult for the side to bowl quality oppositions out at home with just one world-class spinner.  A four-bowler + 1 batting all-rounder (who here replaces the Jaddu prototype) strategy is less-ideal but it would, nevertheless, solve any kind of concern with regards to a long tail and enable the skipper to field the second spinner simply based on merit, not worrying about the individual’s other credentials. With Pandya unfit to bowl and with Vihari nursing an injury, though, this option, one imagines, would not be feasible for the side in the last three Tests. Why the Jaddu-obsession is unhealthy in the long run For more than one reason, India’s obsession with finding the perfect like-for-like replacement for Jadeja is unhealthy. One, as previously discussed, is the compromise in the drop in quality of bowling but secondly, and most importantly, the long-term ramifications it could have on the kind of expectations the management have from spinners. The selections of Sundar and Axar now, and Jayant Yadav previously, are clear indications of the management’s affinity for slower bowlers who can contribute with the bat (largely because most of the seamers can’t hold the willow). “Bowling combination we’ll try to give us as many options as possible, along with guys having the ability to contribute with the bat. That’s been the pattern for success for us in home conditions over the last few years and that continues to be the case this time around as well. The combination we’ve played in the past where guys can bowl and bat is something that will be at the forefront of our plans,” Kohli had said a day before the commencement of the first Test.Grooming all-rounders is healthy but to discard spinners ‘only’ because they cannot contribute with the bat is preposterous.India, currently, have as many as two back-ups for Jadeja, but are at a point where they have little clue as to who their best spinner apart from Ashwin and Jadeja is. Kuldeep was supposed to be the answer but his progress has stalled, and this has a lot to do with the fact that he continues to be overlooked simply because he does not tick other boxes unrelated to his bowling. If India are to not find themselves in a dire situation post the Jaddu-Ash era, they need to start investing in their best spinners. And by investing, it means not only identifying who those players are, but giving them the opportunity to develop and learn their trade while the big fishes are still around, and not just throwing them in the deep end when the time arrives. As things stand, they are not doing it, and it could have long term consequences.Follow us on Facebook hereStay connected with us on Twitter hereLike and share our Instagram page here .
คาสิโน99 88 คาสิโน 88คาสิโน สมัครเอเย่น คาสิโน คาสิโน โบนัส 100
IND และ ENG | ช่อยังดี; เรามั่นใจว่า Batzans ของเราจะใช้มัน – Shahbaz Nadim กล่าว
By admin | | 0 Comments |


หลังจากวันที่สองของการเล่น Shahbaz Nadim กล่าวว่าจักรยานในเจนไนยังดีอยู่ก่อนที่นักเตะชาวอินเดียจะเรียกร้องให้เขาใช้มันไปตลอดทั้งวัน เขาบอกว่าแผนเรียบง่ายและไส้ตะเกียงแบนใน Chepuk จำเป็นต้องตัดให้ได้เส้นและความยาวที่ถูกต้อง ในวันแรกอังกฤษลุกขึ้นจากจุดที่พวกเขาออกไปและจับชาวอินเดียนกะลาจากทหารยามเมื่อการโจมตีตอบโต้เริ่มขึ้น วัน. ความร่วมมือของ Joe Ruth และ Ben Stokes เปลี่ยนเนื้อหาของเกมจาก 263/3 สำหรับนักโบว์ลิ่งชาวอินเดียข้อเสนอนี้เป็นอีกหนึ่งงานที่ยากเพราะไม่มีส่วนเกี่ยวข้องใด ๆ อย่างไรก็ตามนักโบว์ลิ่งชาวอินเดียก้มหัวให้กับเส้นและความยาวซื้อบางส่วนในตอนท้ายของวันและเขย่า ในบรรดานักโบว์ลิ่งชาวอินเดียในวันนั้นคือชาห์บาซนาดิมผู้ถือวิกเก็ตสำคัญสองอันของเบ็นสโตกส์และโจรู ธ อย่างไรก็ตามสิ่งนี้ส่งผลให้เกิดความสูญเสียอย่างมากเนื่องจากทีมทางซ้ายพลาดการวิ่ง 167 ครั้งใน 44 ครั้งซึ่งเป็นอันดับสองรองจากโบว์ลิ่งของอินเดียในการแซง ในตอนท้ายของเกมของวันนั้นนักปั่นที่ถนัดซ้ายกล่าวว่าค้างคาวยังไม่มีร่องรอยการสึกหรอก่อนที่จะบอกว่าค้างคาวอินเดียจะใช้ประตู “ แผนของเราคือปล่อยพวกเขาให้เร็วที่สุด ยังดีสำหรับการเป่า; ผมหวังว่าค้างคาวของเราจะใช้สนามและทำประตูได้ในวันพรุ่งนี้ "นาดีมกล่าวซึ่งเหนื่อยมากหลังจบเกม “ โดยพื้นฐานแล้วแผนคือการตัดทิศทางและเส้นที่ถูกต้อง ถ้าคุณไปที่รั้วคุณจะจบลงด้วยการทำงานมาก แผนมีเส้นและความยาวที่ถูกต้องเสมอดังนั้นกองพันจึงอาจผิดพลาดได้ นี่เป็นแผนหนึ่งวันของเรา” เขากล่าวเสริม นอกจากนี้เขายังเปิดเผยถึงความเจ็บปวดของนักเล่นโบว์ลิ่งชาวอินเดียโดยกล่าวว่ามือซ้ายของเขาเป็นการกระโดดที่ทำให้เขาเข้าใจผิดจากการดิ้นของโบว์ลิ่ง “ ฉันรู้สึกว่าฉันกระโดดช้าไปหน่อย (โบว์ลิ่ง) ดังนั้นจึงมีลูกบอลที่หายไปจำนวนมาก เมื่อวานมีบอลเยอะวันนี้มีน้อย ฉันจะทำงานต่อไป »นาดีมยังพูดถึงการปะทะกับเบนสโตกส์ล้อภาษาอังกฤษทั้งหมดมีคันเร่งเต็มรูปแบบด้วยคอมเพรสเซอร์แบบหมุนซ้าย "ใช่ฉันรู้สึกอยากจะเคี้ยวอย่างหยาบคายนอกเกณฑ์ แต่เขา (สโต๊กส์) พยายามต่อต้านฉันด้วยการกวาดหลังและสิ่งของ ฉันพยายามเปลี่ยนสายและความยาวของฉันจากนั้นฉันก็มารอบ ๆ ประตูซึ่งชนฉันโดยตรงที่ประตู เขาพยายามและทำร้ายฉัน " อย่างไรก็ตามสปินเนอร์ของ Jarhand นั้นดีกว่าคู่หูและกล่าวว่ากุญแจสำคัญในการเล่นโบว์ลิ่งในสนามนี้คือความอดทนและการยึดมั่นในการเล่นเกม “ ฉันมีความสุขมากที่ได้เลือกบทความสั้น ๆ ของ Ben Stokes และ Joe Ruth มันรู้สึกดีมาก เป็นเรื่องดีที่จะตีทีมของคุณโดยเฉพาะอย่างยิ่งเมื่อพวกเขาต้องการ เขากวาดได้ดีมากคุณต้องวางแผนให้ดีสำหรับเขา เขามีปัญหาบางอย่างในช่วงเริ่มต้นของการเล่นโบว์ลิ่ง (รูท) แต่ถ้าคุณอาศัยเส้นและความยาวของคุณคุณจะบรรลุผล” เขากล่าวสรุป ติดตามเราได้ที่นี่บน Facebook ติดต่อกับเราได้ที่ TwitterLike และแบ่งปันหน้า Instagram ของเราที่นี่
คาสิโน99 88 คาสิโน 88คาสิโน สมัครเอเย่น คาสิโน คาสิโน โบนัส 100
IND vs ENG | Doesn’t make any sense to play two off-spinners in Chennai, remarks Harbhajan Singh
By admin | | 0 Comments |


After a late injury to Axar Patel, India opted to go with one left-arm spinner and two off-spinners, a decision which hasn’t gone down well with Harbhajan Singh. Irked by Kuldeep’s omission, Harbhajan has remarked that Kuldeep’s presence in the playing XI would have given a bit of variety.As it stands, India have opted to go with two off-spinners, in the form of Washington Sundar and Ravichandran Ashwin in the ongoing Chennai Test, omitting Kuldeep Yadav. While it is learnt that the decision was made after a last-minute injury to Axar Patel, it hasn’t left the former Indian players happy. Several players have flocked since the team was announced, to criticise the management of favouring the Chennai all-rounder over Kuldeep Yadav. Indian spinner Harbhajan Singh too has joined the list, remarking that it doesn’t make any sense to play two off-spinners at the Chepauk, while still having Kuldeep on the bench. He also added that it was understandable for him why the management insisted with Shahbaz Nadeem when Axar Patel was deemed injured. "It was astonishing for me to see Kuldeep Yadav not get a chance in Team India's playing XI despite him being in the squad. I can understand that since Axar Patel is injured, Shahbaz Nadeem came in as a like-for-like replacement. But it doesn't make sense to play two off-spinners in Chennai," Harbhajan told Sports Tak, reported HT.Since the Sydney Test, where Kuldeep picked up a fifer, the unorthodox left-arm spinner has been sidelined for the likes of Ravichandran Ashwin, Ravindra Jadeja in the past. This year, the list has been extended to Washington Sundar and Shahbaz Nadeem, who have edged past the uncanny spinner. While India looked toothless on the first day, Harbhajan pointed out that Kuldeep could have made a difference. "Kuldeep Yadav's presence would have added a bit of variety to this Indian bowling attack. In the last two Tests that Kuldeep Yadav played, he had picked up five-wicket hauls. So I am completely baffled by his exclusion," Harbhajan asserted."This is also not a great sign for his confidence because it demoralizes you even further when you are a part of the squad but still can't make it to the playing XI."Follow us on Facebook hereStay connected with us on Twitter hereLike and share our Instagram page here .
คาสิโน99 88 คาสิโน 88คาสิโน สมัครเอเย่น คาสิโน คาสิโน โบนัส 100
IND vs ENG | Think we bowled well in patches but conceded runs in the last session, accepts Jasprit Bumrah
By admin | | 0 Comments |


After what was a long day in the field, Jasprit Bumrah has accepted that the home side conceded a lot of runs in the last session but stressed that they bowled well in patches. Bumrah also suggested that India couldn’t do a lot on the surface, which was flat with the saliva ban in play.It was a tough day for the hosts against a visiting England side, who had just completed a 2-0 series whitewash over Sri Lanka. With the curator suggesting that the pitch would sport an English look, all eyes were on the two Indian pacers, Ishant Sharma and Jasprit Bumrah to make the fullest use of the conditions.However, as it turned out, there wasn’t much support to the pacers, who struggled to get any sort of purchase from the pitch. But despite that, Indian bowlers had moments in the day where they were so close to dismissing the English batsmen, at the right time. While at times, the catches didn’t carry, at the other times, the English batsmen got lucky with an edge. Following the end of day one’s play, where the Three Lions finished on 263/3, Jasprit Bumrah accepted that the Indians conceded a lot of runs in the last session. However, at the same time, Bumrah also stated that India bowled really well in patches, and were unlucky. “I think we bowled really well in patches, apart from the last session, we bowled really well. We gave away too many runs in the last session. Hopefully, we will bowl the same and create as many chances tomorrow as well,” said Bumrah in the post-day press conference. “Look over here, the ball did become soft after a while and with the wicket on the flatter side, we had to do with very fewer options. We can’t use the saliva as well to maintain the ball, it was tough for us during that time,” he added.Another sight that was on offer on the first day of the Chennai Test was the Indian fielders, who according to Rishabh Pant were down and out. Bumrah threw light on the same, stating that they were okay in the first two sessions but became a bit dull during the last session of play. “I think we were okay (morale) till the second session. At the beginning of the last session, we felt a bit flat. Especially when the wickets aren’t favouring you, we were a bit dull.”“In hindsight, we can talk well about it (the decision to play Shahbaz over Kuldeep) but this is the team we went with, we will continue to back them. Right now, there is a job to be done and later on, after the game, we can discuss the selection.”The pacer concluded stating that, not just Joe Root, every wicket will be equally important for them and that would be their main focus on the second day of the first Test. “Every wicket is equally important, for us, all wicket is equally important. But our main focus is to pick the remaining seven wickets. So we give equal respect to all batsmen and all of them are dangerous.”Follow us on Facebook hereStay connected with us on Twitter hereLike and share our Instagram page here .
คาสิโน99 88 คาสิโน 88คาสิโน สมัครเอเย่น คาสิโน คาสิโน โบนัส 100
IND vs ENG | Axar Patel ruled out of the first Test; Shahbaz Nadeem and Rahul Chahar added to the squad
By admin | | 0 Comments |


Just before the toss on the morning of the First Test, BCCI has confirmed via a press release that Axar Patel would not be available for selection and is ruled out of the first Test, owing to pain in his left knee. The BCCI also confirmed that Shahbaz Nadeem and Rahul Chahar have been added.With the first two Tests in Chennai, it was widely speculated that Axar Patel could well earn his Test cap, with a debut in spin-favouring conditions. However, on the morning of the first Test, the all-rounder has complained of pain in his left knee, which unfortunately has ruled him out of contention. Owing to the bio-bubble restrictions, BCCI have added Shahbaz Nadeem and Rahul Chahar, who were with the team into the squad as cover. "Axar Patel has been ruled out of the first Paytm Test against England. The all-rounder complained of pain in his left knee during Team India’s optional training session on Thursday. He is being monitored by the BCCI Medical Team and while his detailed reports are awaited, he will not be available for selection for the opening match," read BCCI's press release."The All-India Senior Selection Committee has added spinners Shahbaz Nadeem and Rahul Chahar to India’s squad. Both Nadeem and Chahar have been training with Team India as part of the standby group of players."Follow us on Facebook hereStay connected with us on Twitter hereLike and share our Instagram page here .
คาสิโน99 88 คาสิโน 88คาสิโน สมัครเอเย่น คาสิโน คาสิโน โบนัส 100